Thursday, April 21, 2011

Throw in the towel

In an article titled “applying the towel,” covering a dialogue between Rick Sessoms and Colin Buckland over their work called “the king who led with a towel,” many Jesus leadership issues were discussed. They surmised three distinctive features of Jesus’ style of leadership. First, that Jesus led his followers by creating a relationship. Rick and Colin use Jesus with Simon Peter as an example where Jesus entered Peter’s world of fishing, helped him catch the fish, then invited Peter to join him. Second, that Jesus’ power was activated in influence not coercive power. They mention the fact that Jesus came as a socio-economic lower class person, instead of a political or religious head, as an example of his desire to influence a free-will choice to follow him and not an order or command. Third, that Jesus prioritized his follower’s kingdom potential over his own benefit as their leader. In their words, “Jesus did not invest His life in others to build a successful organization. Jesus invested His life in others so that they could grow to their maximum Kingdom potential.” The twelve, became eleven, would successful spread that kingdom message and power despite the higher religious and governing body’s power of position over them. Thus, Jesus invested his time well, in the right people, who when the time came fulfilled the potential that Jesus saw in them. If we can learn from this model the need for relationship building, proper influence seeking free-will followers, and the heart of potential not title, then we will certainly have healthier leaders.

2 comments:

  1. This article brought out some very good points about leadership. It amazes me that such a simple and fundamental concept as relational leadership is has to be so emphatically emphasized. Perhaps it is because our culture has for some time now desired quantity over quality, we have settled for leaders who produce the desired results, never really caring that they are connected to the people.

    I also appreciated the comments on influence versus coercion. Many church leaders today are so focused on the end goal that they get this overwhelming sense that they need to do whatever it takes to get there. This often leads to the manipulation and coercion of people. A true leader places this opinion aside for a better way, the way of persuasion and influence.

    It is also true that a good leader will not look to their own interests, but to the interests of others. This was a fundamental quality of Jesus (Phil. 2). As leaders we must resist the mentality that everyone is supposed to support our vision and to respond to our leading. This mentality is a serious misappropriation of the power that is inherent in leadership. Rather our power must be laid down for the sake of others.

    Good article. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.