Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Situational Leadership Theory

The Situational Leadership Theory is a leadership theory developed by Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard. In the late 1970s/early 1980s, the authors both developed their own models using the situational leadership theory; Hersey - Situational Leadership Model and Blanchard Situational Leadership II Model. The fundamental underpinning of the situational leadership theory is there is no single "best" style of leadership. Effective leadership is task-relevant and that the most successful leaders are those that adapt their leadership style to the maturity ("the capacity to set high but attainable goals, willingness and ability to take responsibility for the task, and relevant education and/or experience of an individual or a group for the task) of the individual or group they are attempting to lead/influence. That effective leadership varies, not only with the person or group that is being influenced, but it will also depend on the task, job or function that needs to be accomplished. Hersey and Blanchard characterized leadership style in terms of the amount of Task Behavior and Relationship Behavior that the leader provides to their followers. They categorized all leadership styles into four behavior types: 1) Telling the task; 2) Selling; 3) Participating; and 4) Delegating. Of these, no one style is considered optimal for all leaders to use all the time. Effective leaders need to be flexible, and must adapt themselves according to the situation. Hersey states, “A good leader develops the competence and commitment of their people so they’re self-motivated rather than dependent on others for direction and guidance.”

1 comment:

  1. Norman, I could not agree more with your statement, “That effective leadership varies, not only with the person or group that is being influenced, but it will also depend on the task, job or function that needs to be accomplished.” Effective leadership is not having one dominant style or model that can be applied to every leadership situation. This has been a proven recipe for disaster. In my previous corporate experience I learned many strategies and tools for successful leadership and management. However, what I found truly profound is that the types of leaders that this company was looking for did not fit into a specific leadership style. In fact, if an individual was exceptionally strong in a leadership style they were actually eliminated from leadership in this company. Why? At my previous company if you had high flexibility you were destined for upper management. The key was not being exceptionally strong in anyone leadership style It was being adaptable and flexible in specific leadership situations. For me this is a profound understanding. Instead of thinking that we can master one model and be successful we need to apply various models to effectively lead.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.