Monday, May 23, 2011

Less is More?

Craig suggests in this leadership video that less is more. He summarizes in three areas. First, less time leads to a better result. Second, fewer resources lead to greater innovation. Third, that less structure is often better. I do not agree with his concept for the first one: less time leads to a better result. I am particularly at odds with his point that more time leads to sloppiness. How less time equals less sloppiness confuses me. When you have more time you can give more attention to the details, thus being less sloppy. I can see if he meant more time can create procrastination, which often leads to sloppy work. However, I feel that less time makes me more apt to feel like the task is un-accomplishable. He says that less time forces creativity and when you have lots of time it just creates more meetings and more planning. He says that it is better to be prepared rather than to plan ahead into the future. He even calls the 5 year plan dead and stupid. Although I agree that a 5 year plan can change, I would think that without a plan you might become stagnate because there is no goal. I do agree with his concept of less structure is often better. When we over policy the church and become rigid observers of our order and system, we lose immediacy to action. Too many groups can also cause polity issues. I like to run with just enough foundational structure to operate.

2 comments:

  1. I agree with Groeschel in all three points but that is because I have experienced it in the current ministry situation. More time tends to be spent considering the best course of action, which may have been what he referred to as meetings. One can be over concentrated on peripheral issues within, like spending four hours on one page of a 26 page paper. When you have less time you’re forced to spend it on what is important and that which is not falls to the wayside, and they tend to not critical in the end. I would challenge your statement that says that you may become more stagnate by not having a five year plan. The world we live in is changing rapidly and having a five year plan may lock you into a goal that isn’t worthwhile. You said that having too much structure leads to a loss of “immediacy to action.” This may apply to 5 year plans. Don’t get me wrong, we can have goals for the ‘distant’ future, however we risk losing our ability to act and react to the changing world and Gods movement when we lock ourselves into anything. I think he may be on to something but it does need more explanation.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.