Tuesday, May 24, 2011

The Folly of Rewarding A while hoping for B….

I was profoundly impacted by this article from a UM pastor evaluating the UM church based on Jack Welch’s (Former CEO of GE) leadership criteria. Welch believes that there are four types of leaders; Type 1 – Makes the numbers you want. Has all the values you want. Type 2 – Makes none of the numbers. Has none of the values. Type 3 – Does not make he numbers. Has all the values. Type 4 – Makes the numbers. Has none of the values. “The issue is central for Welch because he says the worst possible person in a company is the Type 4 manager – the one who gets all the results you want but does not exhibit the behaviors you want.” At first glance many of would have thought, well the Type 2 Leader seems to be the most ineffective. This is a lesson from the corporate world that we can learn from. Values are essentially the type of behavior that imitates Christlikeness. What type of results do we reward in church: head count, attendance, and income. So if you can get the job done but you do not do it in a way that leads to Christlikeness you are worse than someone who did not get the job done at all. Powerful statement. It is more important how you go about doing the job than the actual result. The heart of leadership in this model is integrity. It is still very important that tasks are completed and direction provided, but even more important is how that work is completed. It is not enough to step on people, abuse staff, lie, cheat, manipulate, and bully people in order to achieve results.

2 comments:

  1. I have always wrestled with this idea of “numbers based ministry.” Rick Warren says that if someone says numbers do not matter, they are naïve. Numbers represent people (and there is a whole book of the Bible called “Numbers”). This article really brings out what makes me upset about such sweeping comments by Warren.

    I do not want to argue from silence, but it seems that Jesus was more concerned with character than a business-like evaluated ministry, as this model rightly points out. Jesus’ ministry was more “transformationally” driven than “organizationally” driven. What does it say about the church’s leaders who are not Christlike but pastor a church of 1,000?

    I would much rather have and be a type 3 leader than 2 or 4. Type 1 leaders are rare. Some would say, “If you get the right values you’ll get the results.” That all depends on how you define “results.” If results are the number of people in your church on Sunday, then I know I have surely failed. Are “numbers” even our responsibility? Only God makes things grow (1 Cor. 3:6). So why do we give ourselves too much credit? Maybe the pastor who preaches to 25 is not so bad after all…

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.