The issue of a consumerist Christian faith in the American church has been under attack for some time. There are numerous books out there that speak against consumerism, especially how it has turned our faith into a consumer product and our churches into a place that dispenses it to anyone who puts money into the offering plate. The reaction to this Christian consumerism over the past few years has been a call to a “radical” Christianity. This is the topic of an article by Skye Jethani entitled “Redefining Radical.” She observes that this has been the typical response recently, but wonders if it is necessarily the proper response. She argues that the call to “radical” Christianity, which is often defined by increased emphasis on missions, social justice issues, and/or poverty relief, is not any different at the heart of the issue than the consumerism that it reacts against. In the end, it is still Christianity that is based on works rather than simply being based in a relationship with Christ. As leaders, it is our responsibility to help people see that our works, whether it be dropping money in the offering plate expecting something in return or selling all our positions and moving to Africa, do not earn our salvation. She mentions 1 Corinthians 7, in which Paul tells the Corinthians that whatever they are doing, they need to be “with God.” People don’t have to be “radical” in order to be with God. Leaders in the church need to find a way to model this for the church.
I mostly agree with y’all, Skye and Joel. It seems like the point is less on the show of radicality™ and more on the heart of radicality™. Meaning that its not necessarily about growing dreadlocks, and moving to live with homeless people. Or refusing to dance, play cards, roll dice, and only dress in short-sleeved white shorts, and black dress pants with plain belt buckles. (those both being examples of radical acts where one is focused on hyper-relevance and one is focused on hyper-separatism)
ReplyDeleteThe last line in your post is, “People don’t have to be “radical” in order to be with God. Leaders in the church need to find a way to model this for the church.” Love the second part, but think the first part is suspect. You and Sky may agree.
To “be with God” I think you do have to be radical. If by radical we mean a type of authenticity that is great in depth and breadth. I don’t think we can casually be “with God at all times.” I think there are too many distractions and seductions to keep our eyes there without a radical commitment, and focus. This doesn’t have to look radical, which is why I make the heart and show distinction.